I am scared to write about books by preeminent writers and then call the pieces Book Reviews. A reviewer arrogates himself to be in that rarefied position where he can sit on judgement on a piece of literature, cinema, music, the arts in general. And to be in that position of judgement, is to unequivocally be accepted as someone who comes with knowledge of the arts, a sense of history of what brings the piece to life at this present juncture, what works have brought it to be what it is today, what in the artist's life has made this work possible at this point in her life.
But. As a reader I have views, oh yes. And that's what I like to call what I write - Film Views, Book Views, Art Views. It gives me a nice sense of opening a window for myself, and for all who read what I write, into what that piece of art means to me - and hopefully would match with what readers are looking for - or not.
And the reason I have to say all this is because I'm in absolute awe of Arundhati Roy's intellect and knowledge. (Though not always of her wisdom. But more of that later.) Her The God of Small Things features in my list of 5 best novels for all these years even as other books keep giving up their place to new entrants.
And it's been incredible to see Roy's transition to become a Woman of Substance along the years, a Pursuer of Ideals, the Unabashed Supporter of Liberal Causes - and as much a Perpetrator of Divisive Views as the class of people she so deeply detests.
Alas, she has, along the years, also completed the transition from being sharp to being shrill.
Her writing has shifted to espouse causes with the underpinnings of details which beg to be facts but are often so obviously anecdote. Time and again. Her heart is in the right place but not her proclivity to push her case based on flimsy rather than verity.
What's happened here, in this book, is that Roy started with a story based on the incredibly true story of a eunuch called Mona Ahmed, made famous by preeminent photographer Dayanita Singh's outstanding tribute 'Myself Mona Ahmed'. But somewhere along the way, Roy's almost-visceral hatred for the present regime makes its way into her story. And Gujarat ka Lalla is laid over into the story, with its Gujarat undertones and Kashmir overtones.
Her story then becomes a political tome, and her transmutation from being a mirror to being a shard to kill is complete.
And the other consequence is an overwhelming sense of intellectual superiority which Roy arrogates herself with. There is a sense of WHAT I WRITE WILL BE TAKEN BY ALL PUBLISHERS AND READERS BECAUSE I AM ARUNDHATI ROY.
Which is a tragedy of such gargantuan proportions. And heartbreaking news for all who are unabashed lovers of her work. Because when she writes, she writes with such consummate artistry and detail, humor and heartbreak. Her characters come alive with all their tics and tricks, their foibles and fault lines.
The first section detailing the life and times of Anjum the Hijra is a joy to read. The sheer imagination and delight of a home being built in a cemetery over graves, and how it grows, and attracts fractured souls, is a very special joy.
But then, causes have to be caused. And Kashmir has to be talked about.
So Kashmir's tragedy unfolds through the author's unabashedly skewed perspective of the terrorists, who are shown to be more victims than perpetrators - because the true villain is the State of India (which, sir, if you must know, is a different world from Kashmir) whose most vicious symbol is Major Amrik Singh of the Army of India.
In all the mayhem and death, the needless violence and bigoted propaganda, Arundhati Roy herself becomes a proponent of sectarianism and separatism, and nothing in the entirety of her beautiful writing can take away the viciousness of her credendum.
Her book, in three distinct sections, work as The Original Story of Anjum the Hijra; Tilo the Confused Soul Converted to be The Enemy of the State and in love with the Ultimate Freedom Fighter; and finally the appendage, which is a Pathetic Attempt to Join Unjoinable Threads - and also to bring in Arundhati Roy's Maoist Leanings in.
I understand that finally a work can never be bereft of what the author stands for. But when Literature is foisted with Creed, and the spine on which the story stands is itself infected with Cynicism, the loser is the hapless feckless reader.
Nothing is more disappointing than a writer who is sold to causes, but is bent on bluffing her fans that she is still producing literature. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness is, unhappily, Arundhati Roy's Massive Literary Lie.
Have you read these extraordinary books, which I talked about?
The Silkworm, City of Girls, Damage, Caravan to Vacarres, A Gentleman in Moscow, Eat, Pray, Love; Sea Prayer, The Winter of Our Discontent, The Goldfinch
I write, so you can enjoy and expand your world. Would you like to support me? Well, here’s what you can do -
share this post -
subscribe if you still haven’t -
tell me of your thoughts -
I love this View! I also commend the relegation of Reviewer to the Dustbin of Supercilious Attitude.
Sending you light and a prayer to keep writing “views” and help shape mine too!